<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Shocked! Dishonesty from a Peacnik?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinyvital.com/blog/2003/02/14/im-shocked-dishonesty-from-a-peacnik/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinyvital.com/blog/2003/02/14/im-shocked-dishonesty-from-a-peacnik/</link>
	<description>Exposing the Fools in Media, Academia, the Left, and elsewhere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:42:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maybe</title>
		<link>http://www.tinyvital.com/blog/2003/02/14/im-shocked-dishonesty-from-a-peacnik/comment-page-1/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>maybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyvital.com/blog/?p=63#comment-736</guid>
		<description>You state that if US wanted to control oil, we would invade Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.  That is stupid comment.  An attack of any country considered a &quot;friend&quot; of the U.S. would be a quicker route to political suicide than the route Prez Bush &amp; Co. are currently taking.  Whereas attacking an &quot;enemy&quot; country (who used to be a &quot;friend&quot;) is a more acceptable solution.  Your comment was not only stupid, but probably the silliest damn comment I&#039;ve read in a long, long while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You state that if US wanted to control oil, we would invade Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.  That is stupid comment.  An attack of any country considered a &#8220;friend&#8221; of the U.S. would be a quicker route to political suicide than the route Prez Bush &amp; Co. are currently taking.  Whereas attacking an &#8220;enemy&#8221; country (who used to be a &#8220;friend&#8221;) is a more acceptable solution.  Your comment was not only stupid, but probably the silliest damn comment I&#8217;ve read in a long, long while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
