1)Why are you so bent on seperating Jane Fonda from John Kerry?

I am not “separating” them they were obviously separated in the photo! I am just saying, why not tell the truth? Mr. Kerry was not funded by Ms. Fonda. For this web site to assert so is a lie.

2) Perhaps one of them was wrong and you don’t want your hero to be associated with the other?

Um….I don’t like either one of them. Again, I am simply saying, why not tell the truth? Neither is my “hero”!

3) Was Jane Fonda or John Kerry wrong in what they did, siding with the communist? What is your feelings on that. Or at least tell us why you are trying to seperate them.

I’m not trying to separate them. They were never “together!” I think Jane Fonda was ve

Oookayy, tell us the truth why you are trying to seperate Jane Fonda from John Kerry.

Isn’t the death of even one boy a ridiculous meaningless waste?

Again, why can’t people just be brave enough to tell the truth?

Mark in Cincinnati

Why are you so bent on seperating Jane Fonda from John Kerry? I mean they both wanted the same thing in the 60’s and 70’s. Or if you can seperate them, are you saying that perhaps one of them was wrong and you don’t want your hero to be associated with the other?

Was Jane Fonda or John Kerry wrong in what they did, siding with the communist? What is your feelings on that. Or at least tell us why you are trying to seperate them.

By the way, I know where a lot of the money came from for the “peace” demonstrations.

Ask Jane Fonda or John Kerry, I am sure they can explain it to you. Or go to Little Saigon and ask Lan and his friends, I am sure they would really make their explination sink in deep.

You little commie twerp.

So, Mr. Serf, I think Mr. Moore has admitted he is incapable of being objective and reasonable about this debate.

Having said that, it fascinates me that one of my questions remains unaddressed: namely, if Mr. Kerry was a man of means from a family of means, why would he need Ms. Fonda to fund his agenda?

I believe the truth of the matter is that it is a prevarication to assert, as this web site does, that Ms. Fonda funded Mr. Kerry’s activities. They didn’t have any kind of relationship whatsoever. To assert that the circulating photo of the two of them – not even sitting next to each other – indicates some sort of “relationship” is disingenous.

I’m not a “brownshirt” Democrat. If I were, I’d take offense that the party that produced FDR, Harry Truman, Jack Kennedy, Adlai Stevenson, other shining icons of reason and compassion and sensitivity would be compared to Mussolini. Wow. Whoops, I forgot, Mr. Moore, and Rhod, and others have already indicated that they cannot be objective or reasonable or reasoned or civil. Ok then.

But why lie? Why the obvious prevarication and misrepresentation about the relationship between Jane Fonda and Kerry? It’s nonsensical, a non sequiter, and it undercuts your message.

Might as well tell the truth, no?

Mark in Cincinnati

Actually if they would have just turned us loose with what we had the war would have been won. Or maybe if John Kerry had been willing to terrorise the VC for the remaining nine months of his tour he could have cleaned out the Delta single handed.

By the way, what were you doing when all this was going on?

I have good news for you, as I have found at least two other people who feel the site is not impressive and in fact is misdirected. I am sure you would like to hear this. They are John Kerry and Jane Fonda.

King Arthur,

Who in the hell are you. Use a real name you asshole.

But if the country is theirs, where is ours? If they want it back, then they like it the way it was before, so that must be “reactionary”.

The expression I like the most is that they want “to bring us together”. Kerry is a “uniter not a divider”. Excuse me while I close my head in a door. Their idea of reconciliation is for us to accept them unconditionally, or Kerry’s Bureau of Reconciliation and Unity will pay a vist to your house.

Beware The Left. They appropriate the language and then appropriate you.

HE KEEPS USING THE TERM, TAKE “OUR” COUNTRY BACK. THE ONLY PLACE I CAN FIND THAT EXACT TERM
IS ON THE WEB SITE, COMMUNIST PARTY OF AMERICA!!!

If you have a bad name because you’re a veteran, it must be something YOU did that someone knows about. Or, just possibly, your hero Kerry gave you one.

Earle Richmond has covered it well enough, but it is true that I haven’t seen much adoration of Bush here. You do have the approved lingo of The Left down. “Criminal”, “reactionary”, “morons”.

In 45 words you managed one ridiculous allegation, one vulgar reference to your body, one profanity, three insults, one bad play on words, two political impossibilities and one statement about the limitations of your credulity.

You’re good. Very good. The Kerry campaign could use you as a speech writer.

First, this is a site about John Kerry and his antiwar activites. With that in mind tell us where you find comments on this site of what you call “adoration” for President Bush.

Second, explain to us how any support for our government that you may find on this site is “reactionary”. I have never heard that term used with regard to supporting an installed goverment.

Third, tell us what President Bush has done that is criminal, not what you disagree with, but what statutes he has violated.

Also, the meaning of the term “useful fool” on this site refers to those who unwittingly or wittingly help those people on the far left that are against what this country stands for. For, example, people like you. As for calling us “morons” I guess that means you don’t like us.

And,as for calling your self a “veteran” let us know something about what you did as a veteran. Veterans don’t always agree on everything. But if you’re going use that term as a credential for your comments give us a little more info on who you are or what you did.

Otherwise, consider your comments irrelevant. I know I will.

By the way, King, you may want to keep an eye on Lancelot. I think he has been messing around with Queen Guinevere.

Regarding Kerry’s medals. He was the commander of his unit and, according to what I have read, put in the citation himself. If anyone has information on this, I’d be curious.

As a side note, a little research would indicate that the charge that Kerry hunted down a wounded VC is probably not correct. According to the gunner in one interview, the VC was wounded (by the .50 cal) but still standing and pointing a B-40 at the boat when Kerry ran ashore and killed him.

JAMES E. WILLIAMS
BOATSWAIN’S MATE FIRST CLASS
UNITED STATES NAVY

for service as set forth in the following

Citation:

For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity in action on 22 August 1966 in connection with operations against the Viet Cong while serving as Patrol Officer for River Patrol Boats (PBR’s) 101 and 105 on the Mekong River in the Republic of Vietnam. During the early evening hours, Petty Officer Williams’ patrol came under heavy enemy fire on four occasions from nearly one hundred Viet Cong gun emplacements on both banks of the river. He courageously directed suppressive fire against the enemy and neutralized a number of the automatic-weapons emplacements. During the height of the battle, Petty Officer Williams detected and intercepted a motorized sampan with two, high-ranking Viet Cong passengers. He directed PBR 101 to cover his south flank, while PBR 105 engaged the north bank and he salvaged the contents of the sampan. Although wounded in the face during the salvage operation, he courageously continued in complete command, directing suppressive fire while withdrawing with the sampan from the kill zone. Petty Officer Williams’ aggressiveness and calmness under fire were an inspiration to all in his patrol. His determination and daring, despite overwhelming enemy fire, directly resulted in the capture of thirty-one Viet Cong top secret, twelve secret, and fifty-eight confidential documents. By his initiative and courageous actions, Petty Officer Williams upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.

For the President,
(signed)

Charles F. Baird
Acting Secretary of the Navy

NOW WHAT I UNDERSTAND KERRY’S SHOULD READ: On FEB 8 1968 WHILE PATROLING A SINGLE ENEMY, SOLDER POPED UP AND AIMED HIS B-40 ROCKET LAUNCHER AT SFIFT BOAT 95. JG KERRY ORDERED HIS BOAT TO OPEN FIRE ON THE ENEMY. AFTER THE WONDED SOLDER CRAWLED BEHIND A HOOTH THE REAR GUNNER SHOT 50- 50CAL ROUNDS. THATS WHEN JG KERRY JUMPED ASHORE, RAN BEHIND THE HOOCH, SHOT THE ENAMY DEAD, THAN CAME BACK TO THE BOAT WITH A ROCKER LOUNCHER. SIGNED BLA BLA BLA DOES ANY ONE KNOW WHO PUT HIM IN FOR THIS MEDAL