Useful Fools

Useful Fools
Exposing the Fools in Media, Academia, the Left, and elsewhere
Don't Miss Behind the Scenes: Swift Boat Veterans vs. John Kerry

Ahmadinejad: Columbia Dean Coatsworth’s Historical Ignorance

Mon September 24th, 2007 11:12 MST

The sad state of elite academia is indicated by the statement of Columbia’s acting Dean of the School of International and Public Affairs regarding Iranian terrorist leader Ahmadinejad’s visit.

Dean John Coatsworth seems unaware of 20th century history.

From The New York Sun:

[He] told [us] that if the Nazi leader had agreed to speak and answer questions at Columbia University in 1939, the event could have helped changed Hitler’s views of America and this country’s understanding of the intentions of the Hitler’s regime.

Obviously Dean Coatsworth doesn’t know his history:

  • Hitler was an intelligent sociopath who could almost hypnotically mesmerize his audiences. A stunningly effective speaker, he crafted his speeches to his targets, just as Ahmadinejah targeted the left with his assertions that the US is seeking a pretext to attack Iran.
  • Americans would have “learned” how good Nazi Germany was from a speech by the charming monster.
  • Hitler would have “learned” how soft and easily mislead were Americans.
  • The Nazi’s had significant support within the US - the German-American Bund and others.
  • By 1940, the isolationist 800,000 America First Committee had Charles Lindbergh on its executive board and its views were prevalent among Americans. These and other isolationists wanted nothing to do with a “European War,” and would have seized upon Hitler’s statements (some no doubt aimed at them) to buttress their position.
  • Reports of Nazi oppression of Jews were often greeted with skepticism, with anti-Semitism, perceived Jewish influence in media, and the sheer excess of the Nazi brutality leading many to disbelieve the accounts.

It would appear that, just as Columbia’s School of Journalism will issue a Masters Degree to students who have not taken one hard (math-based) science course, the Dean of International and Public Affairs is ignorant of history.

Would you want your kid to go there?

Why Sean Penn is like a Feminine Hygiene Product

Fri September 21st, 2007 10:21 MST

Sean Penn like a feminine Hygiene product? That’s just part of the story. Read on…

Today we have “celebrities” who believe their special status gives them great knowledge about all sorts of controversial matters - about which they feel a “duty” to influence us. Mosquito hoards of Hollywood celebrities and news “stars” hum and buzz all around us.

The celebrity as expert is especially dangerous when these preening royals are in the news media. The latest example is Dan Rather, who refuses to stay buried, haunting the blather-sphere in search of re-incarnation.

We need to understand that the fame of these narcissistic “personalities” is often a result of mere marketing branding. The popularity of an anchor or star comes from the development of that person’s name as a brand. An actor becomes a “celebrity” as a result of being a valuable “property” - a name that leads to movie ticket sales. A newsman becomes a “celebrity” by having millions of viewers.

In these areas, becoming a brand is a combination of mostly luck, a little skill, and often a willingness for back-stabbing. CNN’s almost hiring of a high-school dropout as an anchor should make it obvious that expertise is not high on the list of criteria.

That Dan Rather’s unraveling was caused not by trained journalists, but diligent bloggers, further exposes the fallacy of the famous journalist as a reliable, omniscient source. “And that’s the way it is

Do we really believe there are only a few people in this country of 300,000,000 with the ability to be a Dan Rather? I’m sure Dan Rather thinks he is special, but I see Dan Rather as no different from Crest toothpaste: he is a brand, and as such, doesn’t have any special insight into the world or greater logical abilities or intelligence than the rest of us. I am not interested in being lectured on how I should think by a Crest toothpaste tube.

Likewise, I really resent it when a Feminine Hygiene Brand like Sean Penn does it.

One of the most famous of these “experts,” who personally decided that the Vietnam War was lost after the great US victory in the Tet Offensive, and used his post as “thie most trusted man in America” to assure our loss, provides in his branded phrase, the best end of this article:

And that’s the way it is.

[This article is a follow-up to an earlier post here.]

John O’Neill Interview: Behind the Scenes: Swift Boat Veterans vs. John Kerry

Sun September 16th, 2007 23:22 MST

On Veterans Day, 2006, I had the pleasure of interviewing John O’Neill, well known spokesmen for the Swift-Boat veterans, who played a crucial role in the defeat of John Kerry in 2004. I knew John from my time with the Vietnam Vets for the Truth (VVT) during the 2004 election. The interview was held in Las Vegas where we were both attending a conference on terrorism by America’s Truth Forum, organized by Jeff Epstein, himself a former member of VVT..

The interview covers the formation of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, their motivations and actions. John frankly discusses media bias, the behavior of “Kerry thugs” and a number of related topics, such as how MoveOn.org inadvertently helped the “swifties” - their political enemy.

It is presented in two forms: a series of short clips, and the much longer full interview.

All statements by John O’Neill are his alone, and may not reflect the views of the interviewer, John Moore

UPDATE: A new (12/2007) book documents the Vets vs. Kerry activity in 2004. Check out “To Set The Record Straight” by Scott Swett (SBVT webmaster) and Tim Ziegler. Scott was an insider to the whole thing and tells it like it was.


THE FULL INTERVIEW WITH JOHN O’NEILL

THE CLIPS




 +  Site Meter