Useful Fools

Useful Fools
Exposing the Fools in Media, Academia, the Left, and elsewhere
Don't Miss Behind the Scenes: Swift Boat Veterans vs. John Kerry

Biological Terror Attack Thwarted

Tue April 13th, 2004 00:39 MST

From Arutz Sheva:

A biological bomb that was to include AIDS infected blood was to be detonated in a Tel Aviv on the eve of the holiday. The Kalkilye Fatah cell planning the attack was apprehended before they could construct the potentially catastrophic bomb.

The Palestinians have long used rat poison (warfarin) in their bombs. Warfarin blocks blood clotting, potentially making the bomb victims harder to treat. Now they planned to use one of the most lethal viruses on earth in another bomb. Done right (which they probably can’t do), this bomb could have infected a number of people and left many others terrified for months about whether they had been infected. I believe that the heat of an exploding bomb would destroy the viruses, just as the heat of the 1993 World Trade Center bomb destroyed the cyanide gas attached to it, preventing 50,000 to 100,000 deaths.

But remember, to the Europeans and too many leftists in the United States, these are “freedom fighters,” not terrorists!

Yassir Arafat - KGB Agent

Tue September 23rd, 2003 00:22 MST

From the Wall Street Journal:

Right after that meeting, I was given the KGB’s “personal file” on Arafat. He was an Egyptian bourgeois turned into a devoted Marxist by KGB foreign intelligence. The KGB had trained him at its Balashikha special-ops school east of Moscow and in the mid-1960s decided to groom him as the future PLO leader. First, the KGB destroyed the official records of Arafat’s birth in Cairo, replacing them with fictitious documents saying that he had been born in Jerusalem and was therefore a Palestinian by birth.

For those with romantic fantasies about Arafat the peacemaker or Arafat the Palestinian (he’s an Egyptian), this article should set them straight. Arafat was what intelligence folks call an “agent” - a person used by an intelligence service (in this case, the KGB) for the advantage of its country (in this case, the USSR).
Read the rest of this entry »

Are They or Aren’t They?

Sun September 14th, 2003 10:14 MST

US Secretary of State Colin Powell said[Jerusalm Post - free registration required]:

US Secretary of State Colin Powell said Sunday that Israel would incite rage among Muslims worldwide by exiling or killing Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat.
Which is it, Colin? Are Muslims the religion of peace, or are they all supporters of terrorists (like Arafat)? You can’t have it both ways!
“The Israelis know our position quite well,” Powell told Fox News Sunday during a visit to Iraq. “The United States does not support either the elimination of him or the exile of Mr. Arafat.”
But if Arafat attacked the U.S., you know he would be toast in milliseconds. So what opportunity do we offer the Israelis, Mr. Secretary? It sounds like you want them to die for us.
Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat warned Sunday that the removal of Yasser Arafat would lead to “total anarchy” in the Palestinian Authority.
This would be worse than what is happening now?
“If Arafat is killed, the Palestinian Authority is killed,” he said.
If so, then the PA is simply the personal fiefdom of one of the world’s worst terrorists! Why would we want it to survive?
Erekat, an Arafat loyalist, said local militias would rule the streets and the first thing they would do is kill moderate Palestinian leaders, “me included.”
They why hasn’t the PA taken on the local militias. We gave them lots of money, weapons and time. Too bad, Mr. Erekat.
Earlier in the day, Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said that Israel was keeping open the option of killing Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat when the cabinet decides on how to act on its threat to “remove” him.
As is their right, as a sovereign democratic nation that has been under vicious attack by Arafat and others.

Peace Gesture Led to Suicide Attacks

Thu September 11th, 2003 14:25 MST

As part of a truce gesture, the Israeli government released a large group of detainess.

Two of these detainees repaid Israel by committing this Tuesday’s terrorist bombings.

This is how the Palestinians treat the “peace process” or “roadmap!”

Jerusalem Post: Kill Arafat

Wed September 10th, 2003 22:32 MST

The Jerusalem Post, in an editorial titled “Enough,” calls for the killing of Arafat [emphasis added]:

The world will not help us; we must help ourselves. We must kill as many of the Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaders as possible, as quickly possible, while minimizing collateral damage, but not letting that damage stop us. And we must kill Yasser Arafat, because the world leaves us no alternative.

This is a dramatic change for the JPost. Their editorials are usually more moderate. It seems to indicate that Israel has reached its limits of tolerance, and may move to all-out war.

Certainly, Arafat deserves killing. He has been responsible for terrorism, intentionally targetting innocents. No other country in the world would tolerate what Israel has suffered. Perhaps its time to admit that, for generations at least, Israel cannot get along with Palestine. It’s time to kill the terrorist leaders, finish the fence, and let the Palestinians stew in their hatred.

The Europeans will condemn Israel for this, and Sharon will be indicted as a war criminal by the silly International Criminal Court and miscellaneous Spanish judges, but one thing is clear:

The Arabs need to have their worldview shaken. Badly. And right now those who are the most dangerous respect only violence.

Horses and Donkeys and Missiles and Such

Thu August 28th, 2003 22:29 MST

First we had the amazing pictures of US Special Forces operators charging into combat on the horseback, ready to direct high tech weapons from their low tech mounts.

Now we have an Israeli helicopter defeating a donkey cart!

“Modern” warfare is weird when you are fighting barbarians!

The good news: The Hamas terrorist monster on the donkey cart was killed.

The bad news: So was the donkey.

Read the rest of this entry »

False Moral Equivalence: Israel and Palestine

Sat June 21st, 2003 17:50 MST

At a social gathering the other night, I was shocked that most of those present saw a moral equivalence (at least) between the actions of the Palestinian suicide bombers and the Israeli government. In fact, the general atmosphere was hostile to Israel and sympathetic to the Palestinians. This among a group of otherwise intelligent people.

This seems to be either collosal ignorance or moral blindness of the worst kind. To me, it illustrates how our society has fallen.

The suicide bombers intentionally target innocents. They use weapons designed to create maximum suffering (for example, coating the shrapnel with rat poison to cause excess bleeding). They attempt to kill as many women and children as possible.

They are proud of this. How many of their admirers truly believe that combatants should target civilians? These same admirers usually condemn the US for accidently killing civilians in Iraq (even as many of the fondly consider WW-II to be honorable, even though the west killed millions of civilians by bombing their cities). Hypocrisy is the currency of modern moral discourse!

The purpose of these acts of terrorism are either to gain independence from occupation (if you believe the Palestinian Authority) or to drive the Jews from Palestine (the often stated goal of Hamas and Hezbollah, and the actual goal of the PA).

On the other hand, the Israelis are trying to defend themselves, while miniimizing the killing of innocents. They don’t always succeed. However, the intent of their effort is easy to determine - they use precision missiles (usually Hellfires) with small warheads to target their quarry.

If they really want to kill innocent Palestinians, they need only turn loose their artillery batteries or bombers on Palestinian towns… but they don’t - even when the Palestinians use rocket artillery against Israeli civilians. Sometimes the Israelis use telephone bombs that can only kill the target. Today they risked troops in hostile terrority, killing a terrorist leader by accurate gunfire.

Israel’s purpose is self defense - to end terrorism. No serious observer believes that the Israeli government would be killing any Palestinians in the absence of terrorism.

And yet, somehow, the Israelis are condemned.

Of course, the Israelis are condemned as occupiers, as if this justifies the intentional killing of innocents. And indeed, they did conquer the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and the Golan Heights, but only after having twice been viciously attacked from them by large Arab armies bent on the extinction of Israel. Most Israeli’s, with the exception of some religious groups, do not want to occupy the territories. They rightly view it as a huge economic cost to hold a land full of hostile people. Hardly the goals of a democratic state.

But even if the Israeli’s were imperialist occupiers, would the murder of innocents be justified? Should we support Native Americans if they decide to start blowing up school buses in the US? It is *exactly* equivalent (except for the time period of 55 vs 120 years).

Had the Israelis been prescient, they might have realized that conquering the West Bank would lead to decades of conflict and terrorism. They might have been wiser to throw the Palestinians all the way back to Jordan, or to immediately return the West Bank to Jordan. But they didn’t do that - because they are not that kind of people. They are not imperialists - they just want a safe homeland.

Another excuse is that Israel kills Palestinian civilians. And, of course, they do, but not on purpose. Their targets are the terrorists who hide among the civilians. If a mass murderer hides among a large number of innocent civilians, and is surrounded by a large protective force, what sort of crime is it to target that murderer? The same laws of war which require combatants to minimize harm to innocents recognize that innocents cannot be completely protected.

The Palestinians have chosen to follow various despots. Yassir Arafat, not even a Palestinian, is worshipped like a god, even though he steals vast sums of money from them and sacrifices their lives to his personal interests. Hamas encourages children to strap on bomb vests and kill other children, and Hamas is even more popular than the Palestinian Authority. Both groups, and many others, helped by many Arab governments, continuously broadcast and print the most vile anti-Israeli and anti-American propaganda, ensuring that the hatred is passed on to their children.

By any rational observation, current Palestinian society is violently insane. If it were a person, it would be locked up and kept in restraints! As a people, it should be condemned, not supported. Those who provide support to the Palestinian terrorists, especially the Arab countries and the Europeans, have the blood of many innocents on their hands.

They feel no guilt.

Sharon Tricks Hamas into Showing its True Nature

Fri June 13th, 2003 17:45 MST

When Sharon ordered the newly intensified war on Hamas, he so angered their leaders that they blundered. Hamas is now on record vowing to kill every man, woman and child in Israel. This has always been their goal, but now it cannot be denied by their European fellow travelers.

Israel has thus scored a major victory. Many in the world mistakenly see a moral equivalence between Hamas’ intentional targetting of Israel’s children and Israel’s accidental killing of Palestinian civilians during attacks on legitimate targets. This false equivalence has allowed an increasingly anti-semitic Europe to rest easy while funding Hamas’ “political” and “charitable” arms, even as they condemn Israel’s every action.

No longer can they ignore the true nature of their ally. Hamas has been unmasked. As the viciousness of these killers of children becomes understood by Europe, no excuse remains for supporting or failing to combat them. Europe must choose: it is either a supporter of genocide or an enemy of terrorism. There is no middle ground. So far, Europe has supported genocide. Now is their change to avoid their crimes of 60 years ago. The Palestinian people, meanwhile, are clearly in favor of genocide, to their eternal shame.

Israel understand that Hamas will never accept peace, and that the Palestinian leadership fears Hamas to restrain them. The excuses that the Palestinian security structure has been decimated by Israel are laughable, but that is all the PA has to offer in preventing the mass murder of more Israeli children. Israel knows better.

Peace will require a parallel effort on the part of the PA to calm the emotions and rhetoric in its territory, and a ruthless military campaign to destroy those who will never accept peace. Israel is now doing what it must.

Subtle Editorializing by AP

Fri June 13th, 2003 10:31 MST

Old news for sure, but it is interesting how frequently and subtly editorializing creeps into the “straight news.”

Consider this AP story from today:

JERUSALEM — Israel has decided to target top Hamas leaders, including founder Sheik Ahmed Yassin, Israeli officials and media said Friday, confirming a policy change likely to speed up an attack-revenge cycle that has already claimed 46 lives in four days.

The violence is jeopardizing a U.S.-backed plan, launched just last week, that calls for Mideast peace and Palestinian statehood by 2005.


The second paragraph is not news. It is not fact. It is simply opinion. It may be true. It may in fact be the opposite of true. The Israeli attacks on Hamas could jeopardize peace, or they might enhance peace. Certainly the reporter doesn’t know. Nobody could know at this time!

The first paragraph likewise carries opinion in addition to fact.

Hidden editorializing is endemic in today’s news, produced by supposedly objective reporters supposedly trained in journalism. A “trained, objective” reporter wrote this, and at least one “trained, objective, experienced” editor approved it.

Is it any wonder that Americans are more frequently turning to alternative news sources?

Shame on AP.




 +  Site Meter